Contact Us

Use the form on the right to contact us.

Victoria Road
Auckland, Auckland, 0624
New Zealand

Devonport Heritage 2017, an incorporated society formed in 2017, promotes heritage and sustainable development in Devonport.

north head from mt vic.jpg

News

Additional height controls for Devonport village centre

Claudia Page

Devonport Heritage made a submission to the Unitary Plan hearing panel today regarding Additional Height Controls which have been proposed for the Devonport main street. Margot MacRae represented us, read the submission below:

Submission by Devonport Heritage on Topic 078 30/10/15

1. Our organisation has called for Devonport’s commercial centre to be removed from

the Town Centre zone.

The principle reason for this is that the underlying height control of 12.5 metres is

inappropriate to the historic village centre of Devonport.

We have submitted that the business centre be scheduled as an historic place and we are

backed up by Heritage New Zealand.

2. Devonport is unlike the other areas zoned as Town Centres.

If you go across to Devonport this weekend you’ll find two Clydesdale horses pulling a

12- seater cart around the main streets. It’s a hugely popular visitor attraction.

It holds up the traffic but nobody toots or yells at it. It’s just part of the life there and has

been going for 23 years.

Can you imagine this in Parnell or Takapuna, Grey Lynn or any other Town Centres?

3. A height limit of 12.5 for the main Devonport centre will invite intensive

development which will put all that makes Devonport special, at risk.

The principle objective of the zoning is – that the scale and intensity of town centres is

increased .

This is entirely wrong for Devonport’s centre which is widely recognised as a highly

intact, authentic heritage area.

• The western side of the Victoria Road looks today largely as it did in the 1880’s.

• Heritage NZ is scheduling the Victoria Road as an Historic Area.

• There are 21 scheduled heritage buildings in the lower Victoria Road.

4. Yet the Town Centre zoning with its 12/5 metre height limit carries with it the seeds

of destruction of Devonport’s low key heritage ambience.

The heritage buildings could be increased by two storeys and the non heritage sites will

be built to four storeys and this will diminish and overwhelm the historic quality of the

village. It will be death by a thousand cuts until the heritage becomes a sort of window

dressing. At present it has an authenticity and much of this is because of the scale of the

buildings.

5. This height limit also clashes with the Height Sensitive Area for volcanic cones as

Victoria Road is entirely covered by the Mount Victoria HSA which is 8 metres.

It seems absurd to have two such contradictory zoning height controls.

6. Some Devonport commercial property owners support the 12.5 height.

The Devonport Business Association and one local property trust have submitted against

the HSA for Devonport as this will interfere with their proposals for increasing building

heights.

Their argument is that building to four storeys is the only way of growing the economic

viability of the centre. They say without this the village will die.

7. However when the Association’s submission to the panel was publicized in the local

paper the Flagstaff in July, it created a furore in Devonport. (see attached articles).

The local business owners were outraged they had not even been informed of the

submission made on their behalf and were very much opposed to it.

They argue that the main reason people come to visit Devonport is because it is a

beautiful seaside heritage village.

They recognise that increased height limits and adding storeys to heritage buildings

would put their businesses at risk by destroying the very attractions people come here to

see.

8. The outrage from the business community became so strong that the owner of the

Bookmark bookshop carried out a survey of the local businesses.

This showed that two thirds of businesses did not support the Business Association’s

submission to Paup.

Many were in fact outraged that the submission had been made without proper

consultation with them.

Even the Flagstaff in its editorial called for the DBA to withdraw its submission on

heights.

So this is a hot topic in Devonport and rightly so.

9. Not only business owners but residents too love and value the low-key heritage nature

of the commercial area. It is not like other places in Auckland and it should not be classed

as a Town Centre which comes with an open invitation to build 3 to 4 storey buildings.

This is not appropriate for Devonport.

10. I remember when the Super City was being set-up there was a lot of reassuring

statements made that the new city and the Unitary Plan would recognise and value the

unique areas of the city.

We are asking you to honour those promises and give Devonport the recognition it

deserves and remove its zoning as a town centre.

Auckland Heritage protection slashed in Unitary Plan proposal

Claudia Page

Herald Body cartoon October 2015

The New Zealand Herald has previewed proposed changes to heritage protection across Auckland. This is in response to the cautionary proposal stopping demolition of pre-1944 buildings until council had done survey work to identify whether any historic heritage had been ommitted from the heritage schedules. We are not able to view the maps as they are embargoed until 30 October, at which point we have a brief period to make further submissions.  However we are reasonably confident that through lobbying over 20 years much of our most treasured built heritage is either scheduled or subject to special zoning requirements that give some protections.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/news/article.cfm?c_id=8&objectid=11531215

Masonic development.

Claudia Page

In August this year a number of members were in touch with us concerned over the level of demolition underway at the 1866 Masonic Tavern. We contacted Auckland Council with a list of questions regarding this and were assured all was in order with the consent. Recently the Flagstaff has published an article with photos showing the extent of demolition -http://issuu.com/devonportflagstaffnewspaper/docs/october2devonportflagstaff

http://issuu.com/devonportflagstaffnewspaper/docs/october2devonportflagstaff

We requested updates from Council, including a follow up thisweek via Cr. Chris Darby and have the following update this afternoon  "Council Compliance Officers met with the applicants Conservation Architect at the site on 2nd October.  They confirmed that the works being undertaken were in general accordance with the approved consent." Hmm "general accordance"??. Make of that what you will...

 

Griffiths photo - undated, private collection

Auckland's heritage housing in jeopardy

Claudia Page

The Herald continues it's excellent articles on the possible outcomes the Unitary Plan will have on our heritage housing. Devonport Heritage has been strongly advocating on this subject appearing at numerous plan hearings. This continues work we have been doing for over 20 years to ensure our area's character is not diluted.

read the article here-

William Bond Street

Auckland Heritage Festival

Claudia Page

The 2015 Auckland Heritage Festival is running for 16 days from September 26 - October 11.

The festival features more than 180 events across the region - download the programme now at http://www.heritagefestival.co.nz. There are lots of local events around Devonport and the Shore- check out the Devonport Library, Esplanade Hotel, Devonport Museum, Depot Artspace and more.

 

 

 

 

Background to the height debate - DBA and Devonport Heritage views

Claudia Page

In mid 2013  David Barton from the DBA approached Devonport Heritage to talk about the Unitary Plan and the possibility of the two groups making a joint submission to the hearings.

Several things were discussed at these informal chats. Allowing increased heights and building up to 4 storeys was one such subject.

Devonport Heritage said we could not support increasing the height limits  because we believed this would harm the heritage ambience of Victoria Road and the business district.

However we did agree for the two groups to hold an evening in spring 2013 for invited people where both groups would do a power point presentation on our vision for the Devonport business area. 'But this was stopped in its tracks when shortly before the meeting  Devonport Heritage was told there was not to be a joint presentation. So our views were never heard

We have been very busy doing submissions on several topics for the Untiary Plan hearings and we did not become aware of the scope of the DBA submissions until just before the hearings on Viewshafts and Height Sensitive areas and also on Special/Historic Character and Pre-1944 overlays in June. Negotiating your way through the Unitary Plan website is extremely difficult and the DBA or the BID committee should have helped members and the community by posting their submission on the DBA website or emailing it to members.

This is what most organisations do in order to keep their members informed of their actions.

The DBA and the BID did not do this, which has resulted in member businesses only finding out about the submission made on their behalf when they saw it in the Flagstaff.This is either a terrible oversight or a deliberate attempt to keep the submission under the radar.

 

Whatever the reason, the DBA clearly does not have the mandate from its members for a submission that calls for the Volcanic cones height sensitive area to be removed from the Devonport business district so that buildings of 12.5 metres can be built as of right.

 

This submission was not circulated to business members nor to the residents of Devonport and clearly is not supported by most locals.

In view of such strong opposition the DBA should withdraw its submission to the Unitary Plan.

Takarunga / Mt Victoria anchors Victoria Road

Film on the first steps in restoring the Historic St James Theatre- book now!

Claudia Page

A not to be missed event in this year's Auckland Heritage Week is the premiere of a documentary on the St James Theatre restoration, produced by Margot McRae.
The 50 minute film charts the past year in the life of the much loved historic 1928 theatre after its sale in 2014.
It follows the first steps of the new owner, his heritage advisers and craftspeople as they come to grips with the work needed to restore and reopen the theatre.
Premiering at the St James itself, the film showcases stories from the theatre's past and its present and celebrates the beauty of a theatre which remained controversially closed for seven years.
Get an inside look at the early restoration stages of this treasured historic theatre as it comes to life after years of neglect.

9 October 6pm
10 October 3pm
11 October 3pm
Tickets $12.   Bookings essential at    mmcrae@xtra.co.nz

more info on the Heritage Festival is available at www.heritagefestival.co.nz


Margot is also continuing to film the progress on the historic Flagstaff House at 33 Mays Street. This featured in our 2013 heritage night called A Tale of Two Houses.
We hope to bring the next instalment in this restoration of this once grand home in 2016.

St James Theatre Auckland

Mangere's special heritage at risk from Special Housing Area

Claudia Page

 

Ihumatao,  is a green open space near the Manukau Harbour at Mangere with unique historical, cultural, spiritual, social and environmental heritage values.  A Special Housing Area has been planned in its vicinity.

Save Our Unique Landscape campaign - SOUL are campaigning to remove the Special Housing Area designation from this area. Visit their website for more information or to sign their petition at http://www.soulstopsha.org/ and attending the Auckland Council Governing Body meeting at the Auckland Town Hall on Thursday 27 August.   

 

 

Advocating for our volcanic views

Claudia Page

On August 10 a delegation from Devonport Heritage went along to the monthly hui of the Tūpuna Maunga of Tāmaki Makaurau Authority to voice our concerns over the direction the Independent Hearings Panel is taking on Volcanic View-shafts and Height Sensitive Areas. These two mechanisms have been in place since the 1970s and have largely meant that important views of the volcanic landscape of Auckland have been preserved. Alongside this is the extremely high cultural value of the maunga ( mountains) to tangata whenua, with Co-governance of 14 Auckland Maunga now in place. Read our presentation here Devonport Heritage presentation to hui

Takarunga / Mt Victoria from the domain


Unitary plan- Pre 1944 Demolition and Historic Character Areas

Claudia Page

Devonport Heritage is disturbed by the implications of an interim decision by the Unitary Plan independent Hearings Panel that special character or historic areas of Auckland may not be eligible for protection under the Unitary Plan.

This view has shocked Auckland's heritage groups who submitted for stronger protection for heritage buildings. 

Instead the Hearings Panel says the council planners have erred in changing the terminology for heritage areas from 'character' to 'historic heritage'.

The panel therefore says the overlays that were designed to protect heritage areas will not work unless there are cumbersome plan changes to all these areas. 

The panel says the Council and all it's legal advisors have used the incorrect section of the resource management act to achieve protection of historic suburbs. 

We are still trying to understand the implications of the panel's decision.

It may simply be a matter of wording change back to 'special character',  or it may require the full analysis and plan change that the panel have referred to if the council stand by their present stance. 

We feel we have been let down by council and the panel, and also by the weakening of the Resource Management Act that has watered down protection for heritage.

 

We will keep you posted.